Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth?

By Russell L. Blaylock, retired neurosurgeon

Summary of article

The ongoing “pandemic” involving the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has several characteristics that make it unique in the history of pandemics.

This entails not only the draconian measures that some countries and individual states within the United States and initiated and made policy, most of which are without precedent or scientific support, but also the completely unscientific way the infection has been handled. For the 1st time in medical history, major experts in virology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and vaccinology have not only been ignored, but are also demonized, marginalized and in some instances, become the victim of legal measures that can only be characterized as totalitarian.

Discussions involving various scientific opinions have been eliminated, top scientists have been frightened into silence by threats to their careers, physicians have lost their licenses, and the concept of early treatment has been virtually eliminated.

Hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly as a result of, in my opinion and the opinion of others, poorly designed treatment protocols, mostly stemming from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which have been rigidly enforced among all hospitals. The economic, psychological, and institutional damage caused by these unscientific policies is virtually unmeasurable.

Whole generations of young people will suffer irreparable damage, both physical and psychological, possibly forever. The truth must be told.

The Pfizer Inoculations Do More Harm Than Good

The truth must be out and if not via me, then via whom?

I am a former veterinarian who knows science and medicine, and who spent 30 years managing disease outbreaks on farms, kennels catteries and horse studs. I've also helped with numerous national disease management programs.

I know about epidemics better than any politician or "Whole Truth" or "Fact-Checker" journalist. I'm not bribed by drug companies and I don't have a conflict of interest. I just want the truth to be out.

Now, I'm only human, so please don't trust me, but follow the links to the evidence I provide. If I'm wrong please let me know! (Thanks in advance).

Two questions that might be on your mind, which this article can answer:-

• Was it the vaccine that caused x______x?
• Should I take the shots?

Read and share! - Your life and well-being depend upon it.

1. The Pfizer Inoculations Do More Harm Than Good

Pfizer's own 6-month report data on its COVID-19 inoculation shows greater illness and death in the inoculation arm than in the placebo arm. Plus, poor trial design, missing data, underpowered studies, passive surveillance and more.

For the PDF of the video presentation visit: The Pfizer Inoculations For COVID-19 – More Harm Than Good – PDF

Canadian Care Alliance: Citizen's Hearing conference

The above is an introduction to information compiled by the Canadian Care Alliance. To watch and download their Citizen's Hearing conference, go to Canadian Covid Care Alliance and look for the red "watch" and "download" buttons.

(2) Science journal articles confirm the sometimes illegal activities of big pharmaceutical companies

(2a) Dr John Campbell: Comment on British Medical Journal article: "The illusion of evidence-based medicine"

Link to the original British Medical Journal article: "The illusion of evidence-based medicine"
Evidence-based medicine has been corrupted by corporate interests, failed regulation, and commercialisation of academia, argue these authors

(2b) Richard Smith (editor of the British Medical Journal): "Is the pharmaceutical industry like the mafia?"

“It is scary how many similarities there are between this industry and the mob. The mob makes obscene amounts of money, as does this industry. The side effects of organized crime are killings and deaths, and the side effects are the same in this industry. The mob bribes politicians and others, and so does the drug industry …”

(2c) Robert G. Evans: Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR

"The appointment of Dr. Bernard Prigent, vice-president and medical director of Pfizer Canada, to the Governing Council of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, outraged many Canadian health researchers. Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.".

3. News stories demonstrate that RNA vaccines (COVID shots) are not safe

(3a) . Dr Vernon Coleman: How many people have been murdered by COVID-19 Vaccination?

• Do an on-page search for stroke
  This will show you links to 9 news stories about strokes and cardiovascular injuries
• Do an on-page search for clot
  This will show you links to 20 news stories about blood clots
• Do an on-page search for neuro.
  This will bring up two news stories about neurological injuries

(3b) REALnotRare.com

Quote:

OUR MISSION STATEMENT
"Our government asked us to do our part to stop the virus. We thought we were doing the right thing. Now we are injured, many severely. We are hurting, in pain, and losing our jobs. We are demanding our government do the right thing by acknowledging our injuries, as well as establish compensation for the tens of thousands who have been injured or have died."

NZDOS article and St Johns reports: deaths and ambulance stats during NZ's year of the vaccination

Summary and comment

The quoted articles and statistics show temporal (time) association between excess deaths alongside the COVID vaccinations of about 2,000 through the 2021 year.  Likewise during 2021 there were 53,200 more St John’s ambulance callouts than in the previous year.  If the vaccinations didn’t cause these increases, what did? 

It's a little hard to picture what the numbers mean. So let's make it a little easier. To get a rough idea, if 2 million people had been vaccinated, this would mean about one excess death per 1,000 persons vaccinated. And it would mean about 25 persons per 1,000 had needed an ambulance as a result of the vaccination program.

It's time for a risk-benefit analysis! (see page 4).

Contents

Item 1:  Dr Guy Hatchard’s article reprinted in full at the website: NZ doctors speaking out with science. 1
Item 2:  Video discussion of Dr. Guy Hatchard’s report 1
Item 3:  Table comparing St John’s ambulance callouts for the year 2021 (the first year of the COVID vaccinations) with the year 2020  2

Item 1:  Dr Guy Hatchard’s article reprinted in full at the website: NZ doctors speaking out with science.

Graph that shows a weekly temporal association between COVID vaccinations and deaths in New Zealand

In the article, Dr Hatchard states:-

This has been a painful release because it involves personal tragedies affecting families and loved ones.

Some of whom are not aware of the causes of their loss or in other cases have been misled through preventable mistakes of government and civil servants.

For some time it has been clear that the rate of adverse effects proximate to mRNA Covid vaccination is unprecedented throughout NZ vaccination history.

Adverse effects reported to CARM are running at 30 times that of flu vaccines. It is also apparent that many of the adverse effects are very serious indeed.

Item 2:  Video discussion of the Dr. Guy Hatchard’s reportatchard’s

Item 3:  Table comparing St John’s ambulance callouts for the year 2021 (the first year of the COVID vaccinations) with the year 2020

See: St john releases ambulance data for 2021

To make up this table, I removed some categories:-

• Less than 1,000 cases in the category
• Referral by a health practitioner
• Patient transfer services
• Other

And I sorted by percent increase in 2021 over  2020.

Let’s assume that vaccinations were the cause of the increase in ambulance callouts. Not proven, but let’s take it as so. The vaccination campaign only really got going in the last two-thirds of 2021. Let’s assume that the increase in ambulance callouts was during the same time period (May onwards). This would suggest that the callouts during the 8 month vaccination period increased by 45% for mental health and suicide attempts, and about 21% for chest pain, choking, breathing problems, stabs and gunshot wounds, allergies/medical reactions, and 20% for heart problems and stroke.  Over the year there were 53,200 more St John’s ambulance callouts than for the previous year. If these statistics are not due to the vaccination program, then what were they due to? 

Strong evidence against two childhood vaccination programs

1. The current COVID vaccinations do not prevent infection
2. A comparison of stories shows that vaccinated and unvaccinated seem to have had equally mild to moderate infections on the whole (no difference in severity and hospitalisations) - thank goodness the infections are mild!
3. There are at least a few friends and relatives who have suffered following their vaccination, some of whom now have long-lasting damage with no medical solution available. I dont like to overstate the case but it does happen.

Contrary to powerful expert and media messaging it is not wrong to check alternative sources of vaccine information (if it is wrong, email me and tell me why? - Thanks in advance).

You may not read any further than the next line, but do read it - it's important!-

If you listen to two or three sources you are more likely to come at truth. With something as important as the care of our children, it is worth a little extra effort.

Critique of what the Newspaper says in their whole truth article:-

Effectiveness

"There is overwhelming evidence the Covid-19 vaccine is safe and effective..."

The newspaper's quoted evidence for effectiveness is out of date (the studies it analyses are all earlier than July 2021), and show minimal evidence for the effectiveness of vaccines more than 3 months after primary vaccinations (2 shots). There is certainly no evidence for effectiveness against Omicron because it had not arrived by the time this study was published. So definitely not overwhelming evidence. Compare this with this recent quote out of Israel:-

The short-term effectiveness of a two-dose regimen of the BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was demonstrated in clinical trials and in observational settings. However, long-term effectiveness across different variants is still unknown, though reports of waning immunity are beginning to surface, not merely in terms of antibody dynamics over time, but in real-world settings as well.

Safety

There are many types of vaccine injury, and they are common, but the newspaper's evidence ignores these other types entirely, for its safety evidence it focuses on a single early study of post-vaccinal myocarditis from Israeli government health records, half of which was data collected before vaccine-induced myocarditis was an officially recognised problem, which means that it would have been under-diagnosed to some degree (if a doctor isn't looking for it, it doesn't get diagnosed). The study reported an approximate hospitalised myocarditis rate in Israel of one per 10,000 vaccinated teenage boys. When the Israeli study was updated 6 months later, the rate amongst teenage boys had doubled to about one per 4,500, which confirms that Israeli doctors were now more willing to consider vaccination as the cause of the myocarditis.

I'm quite certain that many cases of myocarditis are blamed on COVID infection when vaccination prior to infection is at least equally likely to be the main cause. The following video is an example of this.

NZ case:-
(see this 2-minute video - ask yourself why the patient assumes that it is the COVID and not her previous 3 vaccinations that is the cause of her Myocarditis!).

American paper (quotes 100 references):-
Also, read the quote below from the Jessica Rose and Peter McCullough paper in which they highlight that COVID 19 myocarditis is generally mild, and encourage doctors to look for the easily recognised differences between vaccinal myocarditis and COVID 19 Myocarditis. It is possible to look for the difference in the tests that go with vaccinal myocarditis and thus put the blame on the vaccines if appropriate, but the NZ doctor in the just quoted video clip doesn't seem to know this! Here is what our NZ docotor should have been questioned about in the above video:-

"As a general rule, the ICU cardiac injury described in COVID-19 illness is subclinical and largely reflected by a minor elevation of cardiac troponin, whereas CIRM (COVID-19-Injection-Related Myocarditis) is characterized by a clinical syndrome often warranting hospitalization, dramatic ECG changes, and very large elevations of cardiac troponin that are sustained over time."

See also:

Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trial fraud allegations that should be immediately investigated by the FDA (21 paragraphs, each one fully referenced, that provide evidence that RNA Corona vaccinations are not safe.

COVID-19 and All-Cause Mortality Data by Age Group Reveals Risk of COVID Vaccine-Induced Fatality is Equal to or Greater than the Risk of a COVID death for all Age Groups Under 80 Years Old as of 6 February 2022 (Quote from the article: "The taboo on discussing vaccine-induced injury and death needs to be lifted". approximately 20 references).

You Cannot Boost Your Way Through COVID (this article is controversial, but look for the references at the end and you will see that it is trustworthy).

Here are two further high-quality alternative sources of information:

Lawyer Robert F. Kennedy, Jr: Legal warning to VRBPAC* (against childhood scheduling of COVID shots)

Quote:-

"We briefly outline why such a recommendation [to grant Emergency Use Authorization of Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for children ages 6 months through 5 years old], would be reckless for nearly 74 million children in the United States and millions more around the world."

This is a legal warning letter that summarises 22 reasons why it is better not to authorise and/or mandate the current COVID vaccinations for children. It is easy to read and contains approximately 46 links to reference material

Video interview between Mr Steve Kirsch and Dr. Andrew Wakefield (MMR vaccine)

Steve Kirsch comments:-
"I had the honour to interview Andrew Wakefield and hear his side of the story, the side that the mainstream media won't let you hear."

Background:-
Dr. Andrew Wakefield has been subjected to a great deal of negative press subsequent to his lead authoring of a study of twelve children with bowel inflammation and autism spectrum disorder, 8 of whom became unwell within 2 weeks after MMR vaccination and went on to suffer a bowel and autism problem. The remaining 4 had an MMR shot within 2 months of the onset of symptoms.

Dr Wakefield's paper concluded:-

"We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine".

Here is the original article:-
Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children

Here is a DuckDuckGo search:
andrew wakefield mmr study
(Google searches are biased toward the support of the Vaccine narrative, DuckDuckGo searches are more balanced)

Here is the video:-
Steve Kirsch and Andrew Wakefield interview (MMR vaccine)

Don't be in a rush to vaccinate your children. By all means vaccinate if you must, but do your homework first.